Wednesday, December 28, 2011

I DON'T MIND PAYING TAXES

What a ride it was! Approaching my 87th birthday, I reflect with amazement on the incredible stroke of luck that delivered to me a measurably rewarding life in a great country. I constantly marvel at the courage of my mother and father who left the little hamlet of Bukowsko, at the foot of the Carpathian Mountains in Poland, just before World War I, for the promise of a better life in America. Had they not made that move, my father, a Polish cavalryman in the Austrian army, likely would not have survived the war. Or had he survived, and had I come into the world in Poland, I might have ended as two cousins did in Auschwitz, one of whom who carried my given name. Or, following in my father’s footsteps, I might have ended buried in a trench in the Katyn Forest.


It was not an easy life, as my formative years were in the Great Depression. I know the ammonia stench and sweat that attends the shoveling of chicken shit from a pit beneath the hen house, cow manure from beneath the barn, and yes, I even know about cleaning out an outhouse. I know the misery and danger of logging at age thirteen, and unloading freight car loads of ice-covered hardwood lumber during my high school years, sometimes far into the night so we didn’t get stuck with a demurrage charge for an additional day’s layover. I know the total exhaustion after a night of it. So tired I had to stop every few hundred feet on the walk home, to rest ( I am reminded that the much admired Newt Gingrich claims that poor people have no work ethic).


But I did find my way into college, and I am aware now that the cost of that education was not fully borne by me, considering that tuition and room were only $75 for a semester, and meals came from a pittance paid for scrubbing lab benches every day. Someone paid taxes to keep that State University running.


Upon graduating I landed my first job with Bell Aircraft Corporation in Niagara Falls, New York. There I fell into a career that centered on the design of rocket engines, propulsion systems for rockets and guided missiles. In Buffalo I met a concert pianist who finally decided after relentless persuasion on my part that I might make a worthy spouse. That union introduced me into a world of musicians and artists that vastly broadened my sphere of interest. We enjoyed our mixed acquaintances for nearly six decades. From my happy experience I have always advised musicians to marry engineers, and vice versa.


Shortly, we moved to San Diego, California, where an opportunity had opened up to work on the design and development of the propulsion system for the Atlas ICBM. I had no particular aversion to working on weapons systems, so long as there was an enemy doing the same thing. But aside from the excitement of working on futuristic technology, and personally satisfying assignments such as propulsion engineer on John Glenn’s orbital flight, I was witness to a remarkable transformation of a backwater city into one of the nation’s most livable and productive areas. This occurred largely as a direct result of spending tax dollars - in this instance a redistribution of wealth that allotted tax dollars for weapons systems manufacture. In those days the marginal tax rate for the wealthy was 90%. Tax dollars went in many directions that could not possibly have been achieved through private effort. Notable among infrastructure achievements was the Interstate Highway System under President Eisenhower. Among scientific endeavors - the Apollo program, initiated by President Kennedy, and of course the Internet, which offers everyone unprecedented access to knowledge.


What occurred in San Diego was an influx of a large number of skilled technical personnel, engineers and scientists, mostly young and starting up families, to work on the Atlas ICBM program. There was an immediate need for housing, and the various service institutions that are vital to support a growing society - shopping centers, hospitals, schools, etc. The transformation of San Diego was begun, funded by both investment capital and taxes. The latter provided basic infrastructure - water supply, sewers, schools, and a superb highway system crisscrossing the city and outlying areas so most destinations are just minutes away, free of traffic stops.


As the Atlas ICBM program tapered off, there was no stopping the development of the community. The skilled personnel were settled in and not about to move away. The Atlas missile remained an anchor industry for many years as the rocket morphed into a handy vehicle for launching all manner of spacecraft into space, laying the foundation for the vast communications system now in place, sending the first spacecraft to the moon, Mars and other planetary missions, and of course the first manned orbital flights. The space program would be non-existent had it not been seeded for commercial exploitation and for scientific exploration supported directly by tax dollars. But other enterprises sprung up. Some were offshoots from the missile industry. For example, the familiar lubricant WD-40 was originally developed for coating Atlas tanks to prevent corrosion. Graphite composite tennis racquets and golf clubs originated with Atlas workers who left to develop new products.


The availability of a skilled work force was an obvious draw for other enterprises to take shape in San Diego and the surrounding regions. The original aerospace core business spread out into many other directions, so the city is now a major research, engineering, and production center in medical, electronic, energy, military, and Earth science fields, among others.


Now, in this area of ample sunshine, anyone the least bit visionary can see the time when this region will be the first in the nation to get all its energy from solar, wind and geothermal sources. But without tax dollars to kick off the many facets of the green industry, it would likely never take place.


Keeping taxes low for the wealthy because “they are the job creators” has a hollow ring to it. An interesting statistic would be how many jobs the two hundred plus millionaire legislators in Congress have created since receiving a tax cut for the past eleven years. We hear no boasting, because the premise is false.


Admittedly there are problems with misspending, unwarranted subsidies and outright fraud, but those are curable. A first step would be adoption of public funding for campaigns of public officials. That would effectively defang the hold that corporations and special interests have over legislators. Lobbyists could no longer do anything more than offer information. There would be no quid pro, tacit or overt, other than perhaps a job as a lobbyist, as a consequence reduced to a dry occupation.


So, Grover Norquist, go home, shut yourself in, enjoy time in your fabled bathtub, and spend your days counting your money. The solution is not to take an ax to the system. With your bleak, unfulfilling philosophy you don’t come across as someone with deep and caring insight regarding the future of the nation. How you managed to cow our legislators into fidelity to you instead of their constituents will be a subject for study for some time. I have a feeling that deep down, the wealthy among us sense that there is something fundamentally wrong with what you are pedaling. Really, did anyone among the wealthy suffer when the tax rates peaked at 90%?


Historically, has there ever been a era when a concentration of wealth and power proved beneficial to the general population? Quite the contrary has been the case.


So here I sit in a semi-paradise, a beneficiary of tax money wisely spent, both as seed money and as total funding, for example the great University of California just a short walk away, and magnificent medical facilities minutes away, where the vagaries of old age are attended to thanks to Medicare - a service which should be available to everyone. A touch of the keyboard and I have access to a world of knowledge as well as facts and ideas I can use to buttress my own writings. For these and other benefits, I am acutely aware and appreciative of what tax dollars can do, and need to do, for the common good.


I don’t mind paying taxes. Not at all.

Sunday, December 25, 2011

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

To the Editor:

In his commentary, "The Grinch Who wants to Steal Charitable Deduction" U/T column Sunday, Dec. 25), Professor Smith paints a simple picture of a complex and deceptive part of the tax code. For clarification, there was charity giving before the tax code permitted deductions, some on a very large scale (think Carnegie, Rockefeller).

Deduction for charitable giving ranks among many adjustments to the tax code that were contrived to favor special interests. For very wealthy people who are inclined to share some of their wealth in charitable giving, it is quite clear that they will get a bigger bang for the buck if the gift reduces their tax load. That might be acceptable if the government were operating in the black. But the picture is quite different if the government is operating in a deficit. The charity deduction is lost revenue, so the public is placed in the position of subsidizing the wealthy person's projects. Perversely, this translates to wealthy givers positioning themselves as congressmen without portfolio, spending the public's money.

Within this scenario the taxpayer who saves a few hundred dollars with a charity tax deduction probably isn't saving anything at all, for the government indebtedness is the public's responsibility, and in the current situation the burden of reducing it extends into succeeding generations. To this writer it does make sense to eliminate the charitable deduction.

Sincerely,


Edward Hujsak

Thursday, December 22, 2011

HAVEL, HITCHENS and KIM JONG-II

In the span of less than a hundred hours, during December of 2011, something akin to a pre-volcanic shudder shook the human scene upon the departure of Christopher Hitchens (13 Apr. 1949-15 Dec. 2011), Kim Jong-iI ( 16 Feb 1942 - 17 Dec, 2011), and Vaclav Havel (5 Oct. 1936-18 Dec. 2011).


At one extreme was a despot, Kim Jong-iI, whose father cemented into place an Orwellian nation, virtually sealed off from the rest of the world. Kim Jong-iI - a self appointed god-king over twenty-four million North Koreans, for decades beaten into total subservience to a single human, perversely labeled as The Dear Leader.


At the opposite extreme were a pair of outstanding intellectuals whose lives were styled as humanists, committed in parallel paths to fight for human dignity, fairness, and opportunity for fulfillment without constraint - Vaclav Havel and Christopher Hitchens.


Vaclav Havel was a playwright, author, poet, essayist under the communist regime in Czechoslovakia, whose interest in politics took him into a dissident role. His view of communist regimes was that they require people to “live within a lie,” accompanied by demanding rituals of loyalty. On October 9, 1989 Havel was sent to prison for the fourth time for his counter-cultural activity. Four months later the Velvet Revolution resulted in a bloodless collapse of the communist regime and Havel rose to the presidency of the new republic. This major transition occurred as the consequence of exposure of communism as a confidence game, a gross degrader of humanity. Havel’s stand was that living within the truth was a singular, powerful weapon that oppressive regimes could not withstand. Havel was president of Czechoslovakia from 1989 to 1992 and then president of the Czech Republic from 1993 to 2003. Havel hosted Forum 2000 beginning in 1997, an annual conference to identify key issues facing civilization and explore ways to prevent conflicts and escalation of conflicts that have origins in religion, culture and ethnicity. He was nominated for the Nobel Peace prize but was not selected, possibly because administrators were not aware that his influence was more than local. It was global. Havel wrote 22 plays and ten books, as well as producing a 2011 film. He was honored by the governments of many countries, including the United States.


Christopher Hitchens, author, journalist, essayist, lecturer, was born and educated in England. In 1981 he emigrated to the United States and assumed dual citizenship. Alongside Havel, he has been ranked among the top five intellectuals in the world. He was columnist for The Atlantic, Free Inquiry, The Nation, Salon, Slate, Vanity Fair and World Affairs. He lectured frequently on various topics. Hitchens welcomed controversy and more than once disappointed his followers as when he dared to take on Mother Teresa and when he spoke and wrote favorably on the war with Iraq. At various times he was called a Trotskyite, a left wing liberal, a conservative. As a self proclaimed “antitheist,” Hitchens attacked what he termed totalitarian religions in parallel with Vaclav Havel taking on the despots of the world. Hitchens argued that the concept of a God is a totalitarian belief that destroys individual freedom. His book, “God is not Great” received wide popular acceptance and not surprisingly has provoked much discussion.


These two intellectuals did not necessarily settle anything, but their appearance (not to the exclusion of other intellectuals) came at a time when something quite exciting is occurring - something coupled to the remarkable accomplishments of technologists over the past two decades. Communications satellites, the Internet, fiber optic cables, microwave transmission, and availability on a vast scale devices like iphones and blackberries have produced a sea change in the processing and exchange of information. Information from the thinkers of this age is now available to almost everyone. Despots and religions have little more to offer than rote, intimidation, fraud and unrealized dreams. They are running out of gas. What we see occurring is manifested in Arab Spring and now in the Occupy movement here in the United States. There will be no stopping it because the information exchange possibilities are now limitless as opposed to what oppressive regimes and entrenched religions have to offer. At last, in our faltering system, there appears to be possible a robust counter force to the self serving forces that have led our legislators astray.

Monday, December 19, 2011

DREAM WORLD

In a dream world
poets tell it like it is.
Women preserve order
as they do in their own homes.
Men are stewards of the planet
and all its living things.
As evening approaches,
their thoughts turn to dancing
to rhythms they didn’t know were there.
War is unthinkable.

Saturday, December 17, 2011

VEXING MOMENTS

Life presents vexing moments, but few are more distressing than, while trimming down a stand of grass between house and fence with a weed whacker, you run into dog poop you were unaware of.

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

THE GOD PARTICLE

Recent news from CERN states that scientists doing particle research with the Hadron supercollider are drawing ever closer to revealing existence of the elusive subatomic particle known as “The God Particle.”

When I first heard about the possibility of the existence of Higgs boson, confirmation of which particle scientists claim might explain everything, it seemed appropriate and pleasing that they would also call it “The God Particle.” It moved me to write the following:

THE HUNTERS

Such a probing,
a hunger, to discover
whether skeletons rest
in crevices on Mars,
or diamonds crust upon
the shores of planets
far too distant to perceive.
Then there’s the hunt
to find the smallest bit.
“The God Particle,”
they call it,
or more prosaically,
Higgs boson.
Supposed to tie
all things together.
What a kick for humanity
if it turns out to be
the same as love.

Thursday, December 8, 2011

GOD DOES (DOES NOT) PLAY DICE

Establishment of the laws of motion from the time of Newton led to the acceptance of scientific determinism, which is to say that the paths and motions of celestial bodies are predictable if one knows the speed and position at any given time. Celestial mechanics are behind NASA’s ability to predict that a spacecraft will orbit at a chosen altitude a moon that circles Jupiter some years after it has been launched from Earth. From a practical standpoint scientific determinism serves us well.


But in 1926 German Physicist Heisenberg changed everything with the observation that you cannot measure both the speed and position of a particle accurately. That would carry heavy implications for understanding how the universe works, and had practical import in material behavior as humans learned to make and apply micro and nano-scale electronics. For many years now quantum mechanics has supplanted and sometimes shoved aside determinism.


Appearance of Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle in 1926 was disturbing to Einstein, who found it hard to accept. That was when he issued his famous statement: “God does not play dice.” He believed that there may exist a hidden variable that would settle everything.


Stephen Hawking discusses determinism and uncertainty at length in one of his famous lectures

(www.hawking.org.uk/index.php/lectures/64), leading to his conclusion that indeed “God does play dice.”


You have to wonder: Why one position to the exclusion of the other? If God behaves like people (all concepts of God seem to indicate this) then maybe God gambles just some of the time.


This leads to a thought train that stems from recent assertions by astronomers that Earth-like planets across the Universe number in hundreds of millions. Here’s where one would think Einstein was right. God would not gamble, placing all his bets on a single blue ball inhabited by us humans. Things could go wrong, and more than once they did go wrong, coming close to wiping out all life forms. Is God a gambler, hedging his bets, or an astute planner, wise to the vagaries, shape and accommodating features of the universe?


Accordingly, in infinite wisdom, to avoid influence and cross-contamination, life sustaining planets were placed at distances from each other that would make it difficult, if not impossible to travel from one to another. So distant in fact, that even transmission of information is impractical (No one is likely to wait a hundred years to receive the next letter).


In this context, whether or not humans survive on Earth is inconsequential for a God who only gambles sometimes. It means we are on our own. If we don’t shape up as a species, shed our prejudicial, predatory, greedy ways for the common good, we’re screwed.

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

FULFILLMENT

There’s a difference, isn’t there?
Fear driven, prejudice driven,
an emptiness lasting a lifetime.
Or excitement driven, testing the limits,
over the edge from burning too bright.
Or embracing the middle road
in open-eyed wonder
at the mystery of life
and its manifold perfect forms.
Tasting the fruit as it ripens.
Letting all the petals of each rose
fall before discarding it.
Loving someone dearly.

Friday, December 2, 2011

BANYAN

They call me the Holy Tree.
Shiva prayed and fasted
where my roots stand exposed
like the breasts of a harlot.

Banyan means merchant tree.
Traders gather in my shade,
spread their wares and
bargain with townspeople.

Children open my seeds
to sample my flesh;
a communion
with the spirits inside me.

They taste the blood of me
from honey pots
that stand on shelves
by the sugar merchant.